The Critical Misunderstanding Slowing Indonesia’s Digital Progress
- Futurescale

- Dec 14, 2025
- 4 min read

Why Many People in Indonesia Still Confuse AI Companies with Software & IT Companies
In Indonesia, the term “AI company” is used widely—but often incorrectly.
Many people, including business owners, executives, investors, and even tech professionals, still struggle to distinguish between true AI companies and traditional software or IT service companies. As a result, expectations become misaligned, strategies fail, and AI adoption stalls.
At Futurescale Digital Technology, we see this confusion daily. This article aims to clarify why this happens, what the real differences are, and why understanding this distinction is critical for Indonesia’s digital future.
1. Indonesia’s IT Outsourcing Legacy Shapes the Mindset
For decades, Indonesia’s technology ecosystem has been dominated by:
Software houses
System integrators
IT vendors
ERP, CRM, and custom application developers
These companies:
Build based on fixed requirements
Deliver static systems
Charge per project, feature, or man-day
When AI entered the conversation, many people assumed :
“AI is just another feature inside software”
This assumption is fundamentally wrong
AI is not an upgrade of software—it is a different paradigm
2. AI Companies Don’t Just Build Systems — They Build Intelligence
A traditional software company :
Executes logic written by humans
Produces predictable outputs
Stops evolving after deployment
A true AI company :
Builds learning systems
Designs decision-making agents
Continuously improves through data
Adapts behavior without manual reprogramming
In simple terms :
Software follows instructions.AI learns, reasons, and acts
This difference alone changes :
Architecture
Talent requirements
Business models
Risk management
Ethics and governance
Yet many still judge AI companies using software-company lenses
3. Misuse of the Term “AI” in the Market
Another major issue in Indonesia is AI labeling abuse.
Many companies market themselves as “AI-powered” when they are actually :
Using rule-based automation
Embedding basic APIs
Adding chatbots without intelligence
Rebranding software as AI for sales appeal
This creates noise
When everyone claims to be an AI company, decision-makers lose the ability to distinguish :
Real AI capability
Data maturity
Model ownership
Autonomous behavior
The result ?
AI skepticism grows, and trust declines
4. AI Requires a Different Way of Thinking — Not Just Coding
Most IT professionals are trained to :
Write clean code
Follow specifications
Avoid uncertainty
AI development, however, embraces :
Probabilistic outcomes
Continuous experimentation
Model failure and retraining
Ethical and bias considerations
This is why :
AI companies hire researchers, strategists, and system thinkers
Not just programmers
Without understanding this mindset shift, many stakeholders underestimate AI complexity—or overestimate their readiness
5. Business Leaders Expect AI to Behave Like Software
A common expectation we hear :
“Just install the AI and it will work”
In reality, AI needs :
Clean and structured data
Process redesign
Organizational alignment
Human-in-the-loop governance
AI is not a plug-and-play tool
It is a living system embedded into business operations
Treating AI like software leads to :
Failed pilots
Unrealistic ROI expectations
Blaming vendors instead of strategy
6. Education Gap: AI Is Taught as Tools, Not as Systems
In many educational and training environments :
AI is taught as libraries
Models are treated as black boxes
Strategy and ethics are ignored
As a result :
Graduates know how to use AI
But not how to design AI systems
This gap reinforces confusion between :
AI as a feature
AI as an operational intelligence layer
7. Why This Distinction Matters for Indonesia’s Future
If Indonesia continues to blur the line between AI companies and IT vendors :
Enterprises will underinvest in real AI
National competitiveness will lag
AI adoption will remain superficial
Talent will be misallocated
Understanding the difference enables :
Better procurement decisions
Smarter regulation
Stronger AI ecosystems
Sustainable digital transformation
8. The Futurescale Perspective
At Futurescale Digital Technology, we do not position AI as software
We build :
AI agents
Enterprise intelligence systems
Autonomous decision frameworks
Human–AI collaboration architectures
Our focus is not deployment
Our focus is transformation
AI is not about replacing humans. It is about elevating organizations into intelligent systems
Final Thought
Indonesia does not lack talent. Indonesia does not lack ambition
What we lack is clarity
The moment businesses, leaders, and institutions truly understand the difference between AI companies and traditional IT companies—that is when real progress begins
The future is not software-driven. The future is intelligence-driven
Yet the irony is painful
Indonesia already has :
Highly talented AI engineers
World-class researchers
Top-tier universities
Senior executives and policymakers with global exposure
But many parts of the market—including high-level universities , institutions and regulators—are still approaching AI with a Jurassic-era mindset
AI is treated like :
Installed software
Static tools
Or worse, like legacy technology that can be regulated the same way we once regulated CD-ROM distribution and software licensing
You cannot regulate intelligence the way you regulate disks. You cannot govern learning systems with frameworks designed for static software.
Until universities, enterprises, and governments shift from software thinking to intelligence thinking, Indonesia will keep producing brilliant AI talent—only to trap it inside outdated systems and policies.
Clarity is no longer optional. It is a national imperative
Published by Futurescale Digital Technology Building AI-native enterprises for the next generation



Comments